Monday, February 2, 2009

A. Copy the text below into your own blog:

Essay Author and Title:

If You Run a Red Light, Will Everyone Know?


Central Argument of the Essay:
(p.xx) You can only argue for or against an online criminal database once you have been called a criminal in first hand.


My Central Claim about the nature/effectiveness of the argument in the essay:
You never know of true justice unless you've experienced in justice



This is how the author manipulated the rhetorical appeals:




  • The logos appeal:Obviously there is an appeal to have people be able to know what sort of people they are living with on a daily basis.


  • The ethos appeal: Gives credit to the online criminal databases for making records once hard to come by more acessible.


  • The pathos appeal: Appealing to the families who live in fear of the criminals in society.

My conclusion about the nature/effectiveness of the argument in the essay:

The author is clearly trying to prove that you can never say for sure how you truly feel about the online criminal databases until your record is no longer clean.

B. Choose one of the articles from chapter 10 and substitute the Xs with your words. You will need to locate and paraphrase the thesis sttement of the essay you re analysing and to develop your own main and supporting claims. For each point, you need to boild down your text to one or two sentences only!

These will work as your working thesis and topic sentences for the Rhetorical Analysis #1.

1 comment:

  1. Warren,
    First of all, you need to delete everything starting from point B!
    Your claim is formulated as if you were writing about the issue itself. However, your claim needs to be about the rhetorical effect/structure of the essay!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.